Fall 1999

Symposium: Competing Competition Laws: Do We Need a Global Standard?  

Foreword 

Thomas C. Fischer & Michael P. Scharf 

Welcoming Remarks 

Dean John F. O’Brien

Opening Remarks 

Thomas C. Fischer

Introduction: Tensions Between National Laws and Global Trade 

Global Problems in a World of National Law 

Eleanor M. Fox

Panel One: Different Anti-Competitive Visions in the Western World: The U.S. and the EU

Some Reflections on Competition Law in the Global Market

Honorable Christopher Bellamy 

A View from the United Kingdom

David Vaughan Q.C.

Globalization’s Effect on Antitrust Law 

Russell J. Weintraub 

What Business People Want From A World Antitrust Code 

Joseph P. Griffin

Panel Two: A Wider World: Other Anti-Competitive Activities and Visions 

The Trade Embargo as an International Political Instrument 

Harold G. Maier

Fostering Competition in Financial Services: From Domestic Supervision to Global Standards 

Thomas C. Baxter, Jr. & James H. Freis, Jr. 

A WTO Perspective on Private Anti-Competitive Behavior in World Markets 

Robert E. Hudec 

Luncheon Speech

Is Cooperation Possible? 

Honorable Diane P. Wood

Panel Three: Is Reconciliation Possible? 

Reasons for Skepticism 

Don Wallace, Jr. 

The U.S.- European Conflict Over the Globalization of Antitrust Law: A Legal Experience Perspective 

David J. Gerber

Legal, Economic and Political Objectives of National and International Competition Policies: Constitutional Functions of WTO “Linking Principles” for Trade and Competition 

Ernst-Ulrich Petersmann

An International Common Law of Antitrust

Spencer Weber Waller

Closing Remarks

How Far Can We Harmonize?

Honorable Christopher Bellamy

Comments

Tribal Sovereign Immunity: History, Competing Policies, and Kiowa Tribe of Oklahoma v. Manufacturing Technologies, Inc.

Eric Governo

Centerior Service Co. v. Acme Scrap Iron & Metal Corp.: Pleading for CERCLA Recovery

Joan M. Malik

Note

Marital Property Reform in Massachusetts: A Choice for the New Millennium

Kathleen M. O’Connor

Winter 2000

Articles

Government as God: An Update on Federal Intervention in the Treatment of Critically Ill Newborns

Dionne Koller Fine

 Sucralose: The Sugar of the New Millenium-FDA’s Role: A Hindrance or a Help?

Letticia M. Diaz

Interspousal Liability and the Wrongful Transmission of HIV-AIDS: An Argument for Broadening Legal Avenues for the Injured Spouse and Further Expanding Children’s Rights to Sue Their Parents

Josette M. LeDoux

Comments

Bankers Life & Casualty Co. v. United States: Using a Balanced Approach to Review a Treasury Regulation Issued Pursuant to the Commissioner’s General Authority

Jason T. Bell

Cohabitation Agreements in Massachusetts: Wilcox v. Trautz Changes the Rules but Not the Results

Brandon Campbell

Spring 2000

Symposium

Creating a Violence Free School For the Twenty- First Century 
Panel One: Truancy, School Violence, Punishment, and the Political Response 

The New Jersey School Search Policy Manual: Striking the Balance of Student’s Rights of Privacy and Security After the Columbine Tragedy 

Ronald Susswein

Suspension/Expulsion – Punitive Sanctions From the Jail Yard to the School Yard

Anthony J. DeMarco

Student Discipline from the Perspective of the School Attorney

Robert G. Fraser

Safe Schools/Sound Solutions

Heidi Heitkamp

Criminalization of Truancy

Karl F. Dean

Panel Two: Family and Community Responses to School Violence

Impacts of Violence in the School Environment: Links Between Trauma and Delinquency 

Dr. Jessica P. Greenwald O’Brien 

Uncovering the Roots of School Violence 

Susan F. Cole & M. Geron Gadd

Therapeutic and Preventive Approaches to School Safety: Applications of a Family Systems Model 

Susan L. Brooks

Panel Three: Striking a Balance: Students, Educators, and the Courts

Student Rights: Can We Create Violence-Free Schools That Are Still Free? 

Victoria J. Dodd

School Safety: Are We on the Right Track? 

Nancy Murray

Are We Really Willing to Commit to Prevention?

Honorable Martha P. Grace

A Prosecution Model for the Millennium: The Continuum from Prevention to Priority Prosecution 

Kevin M. Burke

Comment

Be Careful What You Say, Massachusetts… No Reasonable Expectation of Privacy Recognized in Telephone Conversations: Commonwealth v. Eason 

Jacki Ann Smith

Notes

The Accountant-Client Privilege: A Prescription for Confidentiality or Just a Placebo?

Alicia K. Corcoran

Massachusetts Sets Precedent for the First Circuit: The Premarket Approval Process of the Medical Device Amendment Preempts State Common Law Causes of Action 

Juliann L. Safko

Summer 2000

Articles

Grading Law School Examinations: Making a Case for Objective Exams to Cure What Ails “Objectified” Exams

Linda R. Crane

Traditional Issues of Professional Responsibility and a Transformative Ethic of Client Empowerment for Legal Discourse

Brook K. Baker

Comments

Clark v. Rowe: Should Comparative Negligence Be an Affirmative Defense to Legal Malpractice Claims in Massachusetts?

Diane H. Dreyfus

Joseph Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc.: Redefining Workplace Sexual Harassment to Include Same-Sex Sexual Harassment and the Effect on Employers

Miguel Nieves

Note

Deciphering the Applicable Substantive Law to Apply to Maritime Wrongful Death and Personal Injury Cases in the Wake of Yamaha Motor Corp. v. Calhoun

Anthony D’Alto

New England Law Review Avatar

Tagged in :

Discover more from New England Law Review

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading