Faculty Blog, Hansen

The Evolution of Military Justice Continues

Those who are interested in national security law and military justice should take note that the most significant changes to the U.S. military justice system in almost 70 years will soon go into effect.  We have not seen change on this scale since the adoption of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) in 1951.… Continue reading The Evolution of Military Justice Continues

Uncategorized

Contributing Author Profile: Elizabeth Hillman

Contributing Editor: Justin Amos
Elizabeth L. Hillman currently serves as Provost of UC Hastings College of Law, where she teaches courses in Constitutional Law, Wills & Trusts, and Military Law. She has, over her career, amassed a wealth of expertise in military justice, constitutional law, and gender and equality in the law. A graduate of Duke University, Provost Hillman served as a space operations officer and orbital analyst in the United States Air Force. Prior to joining the UC Hastings faculty in 2007, Provost Hillman taught at the Air Force Academy, Yale University, and Rutgers University School of Law at Camden. She became Provost at UC Hastings in 2013. Provost Hillman’s scholarship spans such topics as military law, history, and culture. She has published two books, Military Justice Cases and Materials (2d ed. 2012, LexisNexis, with Eugene R. Fidell and Dwight H. Sullivan) and Defending America: Military Culture and the Cold War Court-Martial (Princeton University Press, 2005), as well as numerous articles, chapters, and reports. She has also testified as an expert witness at trial, before Congressional committees, and before the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights.

Uncategorized

Contributing Author Profile: Rachel VanLandingham

Contributing Editor: Kathleen Frain Brekka
Rachel VanLandingham – professor, author, and former member of the U.S. Armed Forces – will present her article "Discipline, Justice, and Command in the U.S. Military: Maximizing Strengths and Minimizing Weakness In A Special Society" at the New England Law Review’s Fall Symposium on Thursday, October 8, 2015 at 4:30 p.m. During her presentation, she will discuss the teleology of the military justice system, specifically addressing why non-lawyer commanders make prosecutorial decisions, and highlighting why such a system should be improved by keeping senior commanders as decision-makers while creating a more equal role for military attorneys, as well by adding other transparency and accountability measures. Rachel VanLandingham earned her B.S. in Political Science from the U.S. Air Force Academy, her M.P.M. with a National Security emphasis from the University of Maryland, College Park, her J.D. from the University of Texas, Austin (high honors), and her LL.M from the U.S. Army’s Judge Advocate General’s Legal Center and School (Commandant’s List).

Command Responsibility, Contributor Profile, Editor Blog, Military Jurisdiction, Military Justice, Military Law

Contributing Author Profile: James Gallagher

Contributing Editor: Kasey Emmons
James (“Jim”) Gallagher began his legal career as an Officer and Judge Advocate for the United States Marine Corps: serving as prosecutor, defense counsel, and Special Assistant U.S. Attorney for the District of Hawaii. From 2006 through 2009, Jim was involved in the prosecution and defense of more than 100 courts-martial. In 2008, Jim deployed to Karmah, Iraq as the Battalion Judge Advocate with 2d Battalion, 3d Marines in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom. In this role, Jim was the legal advisor to the Battalion’s Commanding Officer advising him on issues involving international law, rules of engagement, and laws of war. Jim was also responsible for monitoring detainee operations, military justice, investigations, claims adjudication for the Battalion and serving as a liaison to local Iraqi judicial figures. Jim now practices at Davis, Malm & D’Agostine, P.C. in Boston. Jim’s practice encompasses advising individuals and businesses on a wide variety of business, employment and litigation issues. Jim represents clients in these issues in both state and federal courts and in front of multiple administrative bodies.